Current Affairs

General Studies Prelims

General Studies (Mains)

China’s Yarlung Zangbo Dam

China’s Yarlung Zangbo Dam

The construction of a massive hydroelectric dam by China on the Yarlung Zangbo river has raised concerns for India. This river, known as the Brahmaputra in India, is vital for millions of people in the northeastern states and Bangladesh. The dam is part of China’s strategy to transition to renewable energy, as outlined in its 14th Five-Year Plan. Despite the potential benefits of renewable energy, the implications for India’s water security and environmental stability are deep.

Geographical and Hydrological Context

The Yarlung Zangbo river originates in Tibet and flows into India, where it is called the Siang in Arunachal Pradesh. The river is crucial for the water supply of India and Bangladesh. India relies heavily on rivers originating in Tibet, which contribute to its water resources. Any alteration in the river’s flow due to dam construction raises alarms for these lower riparian states.

Legal Framework and International Concerns

The dam raises critical issues under international water law. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses emphasises equitable utilisation and cooperation. However, neither China nor India are signatories to this convention. China claims to follow principles of cooperation and shared responsibility. Yet, many lower riparian states view China’s actions as unilateral and potentially harmful.

Environmental Implications

Constructing the dam in a seismically active region poses risks. Earthquakes could destabilise the structure, leading to catastrophic consequences. Furthermore, the dam would disrupt local ecosystems, alter sediment flows, and threaten biodiversity. The potential environmental damage could affect not only India but also Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, and Pakistan.

Political Dynamics and Regional Relations

The water issue is closely linked to the political relations between India and China. Recent tensions and fluctuating bilateral ties complicate the situation. The expiration of memoranda of understanding regarding water data sharing raises concerns about future cooperation. Despite diplomatic engagements, mistrust remains prevalent, impacting water management strategies.

Future Negotiations and Collaborative Efforts

A regional water negotiation plan is essential for managing transboundary rivers. However, the political climate in South Asia makes collaboration challenging. The lack of a regional organisation hampers collective strategies. The Expert Level Mechanism (ELM) could play role in managing water-related matters, encouraging trust through information sharing.

Bangladesh’s Position

Bangladesh has not raised concerns over the dam project. This is largely due to its changing political landscape and its growing ties with China. The shift in Bangladesh’s political dynamics post-2024 has affected its relationship with India, further complicating the regional water discourse.

Questions for UPSC:

  1. Critically discuss the implications of large-scale hydroelectric projects on transboundary water relations.
  2. Examine the role of international water law in managing disputes between upper and lower riparian states.
  3. Analyse the environmental risks associated with dam construction in seismically active regions.
  4. Estimate the impact of changing political dynamics in South Asia on regional water cooperation efforts.

Answer Hints:

1. Critically discuss the implications of large-scale hydroelectric projects on transboundary water relations.
  1. Large-scale hydroelectric projects can alter natural river flows, impacting water availability for downstream countries.
  2. They may lead to tensions and conflicts between upper and lower riparian states over water rights and usage.
  3. Such projects often lack comprehensive bilateral agreements, increasing the risk of unilateral actions by the upper riparian state.
  4. Environmental degradation from dam construction can affect ecosystems and livelihoods in downstream regions.
  5. Effective communication and data sharing are essential to mitigate misunderstandings and build trust between nations.
2. Examine the role of international water law in managing disputes between upper and lower riparian states.
  1. International water law, such as the UN Watercourses Convention, promotes equitable and reasonable utilization of shared water resources.
  2. It emphasizes the obligation to prevent harm to downstream states, encouraging cooperation and dialogue.
  3. Both China and India are not signatories to the convention, complicating legal recourse in disputes.
  4. Legal frameworks can help establish guidelines for data sharing, resource management, and conflict resolution.
  5. Engagement in international legal norms can enhance trust and facilitate negotiations between riparian states.
3. Analyse the environmental risks associated with dam construction in seismically active regions.
  1. Seismically active regions pose a high risk of earthquakes, which can destabilize dams and lead to catastrophic failures.
  2. Dams can disrupt natural sediment flow, affecting river ecosystems and biodiversity downstream.
  3. Construction may lead to habitat loss for various aquatic and terrestrial species in the river basin.
  4. Increased riverbank erosion and altered water temperatures can further threaten local ecosystems.
  5. Comprehensive environmental assessments are critical to understanding and mitigating potential risks before construction.
4. Estimate the impact of changing political dynamics in South Asia on regional water cooperation efforts.
  1. Political tensions between India and its neighbors can hinder collaborative water management initiatives.
  2. The expiration of memoranda of understanding (MoUs) on water data sharing reflects a decline in trust and cooperation.
  3. Shifts in government and political alliances, like Bangladesh’s changing relations with China, can complicate regional agreements.
  4. Lack of a regional organization for water management limits collective action and negotiation capabilities.
  5. Ongoing diplomatic engagements are crucial for rebuilding trust and facilitating effective water management strategies.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archives