Current Affairs

General Studies Prelims

General Studies (Mains)

International Day of Women and Girls in Science : February 11

International Day of Women and Girls in Science : February 11

Observed each year on February 11th, the United Nations International Day of Women and Girls in Science aims crucial spotlight on the need to address unequal access across science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) fields. While more women now participate and lead impactful innovations, global STEM education and career participation gaps persist between genders.

  • Outdated biases on abilities, restricted professional advancement opportunities, fewer visible female scientist role models, and socio-cultural pressures contribute towards discouraging girls ’STEM ambitions.
  • But emerging progress, empowerment initiatives, and calls-to-action urge dismantling barriers through wide-scale policy reforms alongside grassroots change within classrooms, universities and workplaces worldwide.

The Pressing Statistics

  • Only around 30% of researchers globally are women, falling as low as 15% in AI roles specifically. Female scientists also struggle accessing leadership influence needed to shape policy and resource decisions.
  • Across regions, women make up over 35% of STEM graduates in higher education but only 25-35% enter related careers – a major drop-off point. Discrimination extends even where baseline education access expands.
  • Up to 45% of teenage STEM students in some nations are girls – but far less matriculate in the jobs later on. Married women scientists disproportionately exit careers compared to men.
  • Negative ability assumptions deter girls beginning in secondary school, eroding interest in science electives over humanities/arts. They fall behind male peers entering higher education programs like engineering or physics.

Key Driving Factors Behind Ongoing Gender Gaps

Biases Embedded in Social Structures
  • Teachers often unconsciously link giftedness to boys in analytical/mathematical thinking. Young girls internalize these messaging, undermining confidence in personal abilities. Controlled studies reveal equivalent competencies when biases removed.
Socio-Cultural Pressures
  • Outdated but prevalent norms depict STEM as unfeminine, while developing regions particularly contend with ideals for domestic women’s roles. Western cultures grapple with similar “Bro Culture” barriers.
  • “Stereotype threat” likewise emotionally taxes women’s performance and sense of belonging when environments subtly signal negative gender assumptions.
Need for Relatable Role Models
  • Girls lack visible mentors proving women’s success is achievable in scientific occupations, with unbalanced media depictions exacerbating perceptions. Without envisioning futures filled with female pioneers, ambitions shrink.

Examples of Progress

Increased Participation
  • Some developing countries expand seats for women in STEM university programs, with graduates reaching over 40% female in places like India. New software engineering jobs filled predominately by women lately as well.
Outstanding Contributions
  • Pioneers like mathematician Maryam Mirzakhani and geneticist Emmanuelle Charpentier make tremendous research impacts in fields like geometry and gene editing. But countless more everyday contributions come from problem-solving women seeking patents across industries.
Commitments Voiced by Stakeholders
  • Over 50 countries pursue girls’ science education environmental initiatives led for 2024’s Day events. Private sector groups like Apple expand young women’s coding programs reaching 5 more Asia-Pacific universities.
  • Regional bodies monitor participation gaps more closely and cooperate sharing cultural barrier solutions. The UN suggests full gender parity in 15 years as a potential aim.

Eliminating Barriers – Accountability and Actions

  • Reforms needed for biased classroom cultures and STEM higher education retaining women faculty through work-life supports.
  • Visibility must improve around female STEM professionals at all career levels to inspire youth. Assumptions on innate “brilliance” required also hurts female students and limits cooperation.
  • Mentor programs successfully counter discouraging stereotypes by focusing encouragement on diligence over raw talent. Inspiring majority of young girls towards STEM career possibilities by early secondary school years proves crucial for societies preparing next generation scientists.

With women and girls consistently finding STEM ambitions blocked from nurturing, voices worldwide demand honest confrontation of equality commitments to catalyze cultural shifts. Inclusive scientific horizons allow communities everywhere to progress further.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archives