ITBP Establishes New Base to Combat Naxal Activities

The Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) launched a new Company Operative Base (COB) in Kutul, located in the Abhujhmad region of Chhattisgarh. This area is notorious for Naxalite insurgency and is considered a stronghold for these groups. The establishment of this base aims to enhance security and reduce Naxalite activities in this remote and challenging terrain.

Background of Naxalite Insurgency

Naxalism is a form of left-wing extremism that originated in India during the late 1960s. It seeks to address socio-economic inequalities through armed struggle. The Abhujhmad region has been a focal point for Naxal activities due to its dense forests and difficult accessibility. This has made it a sanctuary for insurgents.

Role of ITBP

The ITBP is primarily tasked with guarding the Indo-China border but has also been involved in internal security operations. The establishment of the COB in Kutul signifies a strategic move to tackle internal security threats. The ITBP’s 41st Battalion is leading this initiative under the Tactical Sector Headquarters based in Bhubaneswar, Odisha.

Mission Kagar-2026

The new COB is part of Mission Kagar-2026, a comprehensive strategy by the Government of India aimed at eradicating Naxalism. This mission focuses on not only military action but also on socio-economic development in affected areas. The ITBP’s presence in Kutul is expected to boost these efforts.

Impact on Local Population

The establishment of the COB is anticipated to instil a sense of security among local residents. The ITBP aims to reduce fear and encourage the population to participate in mainstream society. By curbing Naxalite influence, the government hopes to encourage development and stability in the region.

Challenges in Implementation

Despite the establishment of the COB, challenges remain. The terrain is rugged and the area is sparsely populated, complicating logistics and operations. Additionally, the Naxalites have deep-rooted support in the region, making it difficult to completely eradicate their influence.

Future Prospects

The ITBP’s ongoing efforts to establish more COBs in the region suggest a long-term commitment to combating Naxalism. Continued collaboration with local communities and other governmental agencies will be essential for the success of these initiatives.

Questions for UPSC:

1. Examine the socio-economic factors contributing to the persistence of Naxalite insurgency in India.
2. Critically discuss the effectiveness of security forces in combating left-wing extremism in India.
3. Analyse the implications of establishing Company Operative Bases in Naxal-affected regions for local governance.
4. Point out the challenges faced by the Indo-Tibetan Border Police in maintaining internal security in remote areas.

Answer Hints:

1. Examine the socio-economic factors contributing to the persistence of Naxalite insurgency in India.

1. Widespread poverty and unemployment in rural areas fuel discontent.
2. Lack of access to education and healthcare perpetuates socio-economic disparities.
3. Land issues and exploitation by landlords create grievances among tribal communities.
4. Government neglect in remote regions leads to feelings of alienation and resentment.
5. Corruption and inefficiency in local governance hinder development efforts.

2. Critically discuss the effectiveness of security forces in combating left-wing extremism in India.

1. Security forces have made arrests and disrupted Naxalite operations.
2. However, they often lack local knowledge and community support, limiting effectiveness.
3. Military strategies alone may not address the root causes of insurgency.
4. There is a need for better coordination among various security agencies.
5. Efforts to engage with local populations have seen mixed results.

3. Analyse the implications of establishing Company Operative Bases in Naxal-affected regions for local governance.

1. COBs can enhance security and reduce Naxalite influence in the region.
2. Increased presence of security forces may improve local governance and law enforcement.
3. Local populations may feel more secure, leading to greater participation in governance.
4. Potential for improved infrastructure and socio-economic development initiatives.
5. Risk of militarization and potential backlash from Naxalite sympathizers.

4. Point out the challenges faced by the Indo-Tibetan Border Police in maintaining internal security in remote areas.

1. Rugged terrain complicates movement and logistics for security operations.
2. Sparse population makes it difficult to gather intelligence on Naxalite activities.
3. Limited resources and manpower can hinder effective patrolling and response.
4. Deep-rooted local support for Naxalites poses challenge.
5. Maintaining community relations while enforcing security can be delicate.