Current Affairs

General Studies Prelims

General Studies (Mains)

Rising Female Labour Force Participation in India

Rising Female Labour Force Participation in India

India has witnessed a notable increase in female Labour Force Participation Rate (LFPR) since 2017. Recent research marks the impact of age, marriage, and children on women’s workforce engagement. Despite improvements, cultural and social norms still create barriers to women’s employment. This analysis draws from a working paper by the Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister, emphasising findings that reflect the complexities of female participation in the labour market.

Current Trends in Female LFPR

The female LFPR surged from 24.6% to 41.5% between 2017 and 2022. Rural areas showed a dramatic increase, contrasting with a modest rise in urban sectors. Notably, this increase persists even when unpaid domestic work is excluded from the analysis. The growth in rural participation is attributed to improved measurement methods and changing economic conditions.

Age and Employment Dynamics

The analysis reveals that female LFPR peaks between the ages of 30 and 40. After this age, participation declines sharply. In contrast, male LFPR remains stable until later in life. This trend suggests that women face greater challenges in maintaining employment as they age, often linked to familial responsibilities.

Impact of Marriage and Family

Married women, especially in urban contexts, are less likely to participate in the labour force compared to unmarried women. There are variations across states, with some rural married women in states like Rajasthan and Maharashtra remaining active in the workforce beyond 40 years of age. Conversely, married men consistently show higher participation rates than their unmarried counterparts.

Interstate Variations

The paper marks interstate disparities in female LFPR. States like Jharkhand and Bihar exhibit remarkable growth, while Punjab and Haryana, despite their wealth, report low participation rates. Northeastern states, such as Nagaland, show impressive increases in female employment, indicating the influence of regional socio-economic factors.

Influence of Socio-Cultural Factors

Cultural and social norms play a critical role in shaping female LFPR. The paper notes that traditional roles and expectations often limit women’s employment opportunities. This is evident across various states, where economic conditions do not always correlate with high female participation rates.

Future Implications

About the dynamics of female LFPR is essential for policy formulation. Addressing barriers related to age, marriage, and cultural norms can enhance women’s participation in the workforce. This will contribute to economic growth and gender equality in India.

Questions for UPSC:

  1. Critically discuss the socio-economic factors influencing female Labour Force Participation Rate in India.
  2. Examine the relationship between cultural norms and women’s workforce engagement in different state of Indias.
  3. Analyse the impact of marital status on female employment rates in urban and rural India.
  4. Estimate the role of agricultural practices in determining female Labour Force Participation across various regions in India.

Answer Hints:

1. Critically discuss the socio-economic factors influencing female Labour Force Participation Rate in India.
  1. Economic conditions – Growth in rural LFPR linked to improved measurement and changing economic opportunities.
  2. Education – Higher educational attainment correlates with increased female participation in the workforce.
  3. Employment opportunities – Availability of jobs, particularly in rural areas, affects women’s workforce engagement.
  4. Age and family responsibilities – Advancing age and familial roles often limit women’s ability to participate in the labor force.
  5. Regional disparities – Differences in socio-economic development across states lead to varied LFPR outcomes.
2. Examine the relationship between cultural norms and women’s workforce engagement in different states of India.
  1. Traditional roles – Cultural expectations often restrict women’s employment opportunities, particularly in conservative states.
  2. Socio-economic diversity – Variations in cultural attitudes towards work influence LFPR across different regions.
  3. Impact of education – In states with higher education levels, cultural norms may shift to support women in the workforce.
  4. Regional examples – States like Bihar and Punjab show low LFPR despite economic status due to entrenched cultural norms.
  5. Changing dynamics – Increased urbanization and exposure to global norms are gradually altering cultural perceptions.
3. Analyse the impact of marital status on female employment rates in urban and rural India.
  1. Married women’s participation – Urban married women are generally less likely to work compared to unmarried counterparts.
  2. State variations – In states like Rajasthan, married rural women show higher participation rates, especially post-40.
  3. Gender disparity – Married men consistently participate more in the workforce than unmarried men across all ages.
  4. Family dynamics – Marital responsibilities often limit women’s ability to seek employment opportunities.
  5. Interstate differences – Cultural and socio-economic factors influence how marital status affects LFPR in different states.
4. Estimate the role of agricultural practices in determining female Labour Force Participation across various regions in India.
  1. Agricultural dependence – Regions heavily reliant on agriculture typically show higher female LFPR due to labor needs.
  2. Cropping patterns – Certain crops, like rice, are associated with higher female participation in agricultural labor.
  3. Seasonal employment – Women often participate in agricultural work seasonally, impacting overall LFPR statistics.
  4. Regional differences – States with diverse agricultural practices exhibit varied LFPR outcomes among women.
  5. Economic contribution – Women’s involvement in agriculture is crucial for household income and food security in rural areas.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archives