Current Affairs

General Studies Prelims

General Studies (Mains)

Supreme Court Upholds Amendments Allowing Jallikattu

The recent developments surrounding the traditional bull-taming sports of Jallikattu in Tamil Nadu, Kambala in Karnataka and bullock-cart racing in Maharashtra, have triggered a sequence of debates and amendments in the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. The Supreme Court has validated the amendments made by Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Maharashtra, allowing these traditional sports to continue, leading to discussions of cultural significance versus animal rights.

The Supreme Court’s Judgement on Amendments

The case emerged as a challenge to the Tamil Nadu Amendment permitting Jallikattu, arguing that it contravenes the central law prohibiting animal cruelty. However, the Supreme Court held that the state amendments did not violate the Constitution nor the Supreme Court’s 2014 ruling banning Jallikattu. The Amendments were seen to lessen the pain and cruelty inflicted on participating animals. The court also affirmed that any violation of the law under the cloak of cultural tradition would be punishable.

The Tradition of Jallikattu

Jallikattu is a popular sport in Tamil Nadu, celebrated during the Tamil harvest festival, Pongal in January. The game involves releasing a wild bull into a crowd where participants attempt to mount and control the animal. Despite its risks, it is seen as a significant religious and cultural event amongst various communities.

Arguments Supporting Jallikattu

The State government proposes that the practice can be regulated and reformed rather than completely banned. They argue that a prohibition would be viewed as an assault on community culture and sentiments. They further stress the role of Jallikattu in preserving indigenous breeds of livestock and teaching younger generations about their cultural heritage.

Opposition to the Practice

However, critics argue that Jallikattu violates animal welfare and safety standards, a right protected under the Constitution. They point out numerous cases of human and bull injuries and deaths, and cruel treatment of the animals by participants. Critics also compare Jallikattu to abusive practices like Sati and dowry, which were culturally accepted but have since been abolished due to their harmful nature.

The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960

The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, is a central legislation focusing on avoiding unnecessary suffering inflicted on animals. It lays down regulations for experiments on animals, exhibitions of performing animals, their treatment, and penalties for violations. It also establishes the Animal Welfare Board of India (AWBI) to ensure animal protection.

Other Traditional Sports

Apart from Jallikattu, there are other traditional sports involving animals such as Kambala, a traditional buffalo race held in Karnataka’s paddy fields filled with slush and mud. These sports are equally steeped in controversy regarding animal rights and cultural preservation.

Previous Queries Regarding Animal Welfare

Past queries in Civil Services Examinations have revolved around issues like the establishment of the Animal Welfare Board of India, the National Tiger Conservation Authority and positions of authority in the National Ganga River Basin Authority. Questions have also been raised about the challenges to cultural practices under the pretext of secularism.

This debate underscores the delicate balance between preserving cultural heritages and ensuring the welfare of animals. Both perspectives offer valid points, fueling the continued discussions around this complex issue.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archives