Tamil Nadu Rejects PM Vishwakarma Scheme

The Prime Minister Vishwakarma Scheme was launched on September 17, 2023. It aims to support traditional artisans through various means. These include recognition via certificates, skill upgrading, and financial incentives. However, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin announced on November 28 that the scheme would not be implemented in its current form. He called for modifications to make it more inclusive and equitable.

Overview of the PM Vishwakarma Scheme

The scheme offers several benefits to artisans. It provides PM Vishwakarma certificates and ID cards. Skill verification and training are also included. Financial assistance consists of toolkit incentives up to ₹15,000 and credit support up to ₹3,00,000. Additionally, incentives for digital transactions are part of the package. The goal is to empower traditional trades and enhance competitiveness.

Stalin’s Proposed Modifications

CM Stalin outlined specific changes to the scheme. He proposed removing the requirement that applicants must come from families traditionally engaged in specific trades. This change aims to broaden eligibility. The minimum age for applicants could be raised to 35 years. This adjustment ensures that individuals have made informed career choices. Furthermore, he suggested that the verification process should be handled by Village Administrative Officers instead of Gram Panchayat heads.

Political Reactions

The decision has sparked political debate. BJP State Vice President Narayanan Thirupathy argued that the scheme is essential for traditional artisans. He claimed it provides necessary financial and technical support to compete with larger corporations. Thirupathy accused the Tamil Nadu government of misrepresenting the scheme as caste-oriented. AIADMK leader Kovai Sathyan also commented on the situation. He suggested that the DMK government is attempting to portray itself as the saviour of Tamil Nadu. He brought into light the need for transparency regarding the recommendations made by the Tamil Nadu government concerning the Vishwakarma Scheme.

Economic Context

Tamil Nadu is India’s second-largest economy. The state has a low poverty rate, with less than 3% of the population below the poverty line. This context raises questions about the necessity of new schemes for uplifting the poor. Critics argue that initiatives should not be viewed solely through the lens of caste and creed.

Social Justice Considerations

The emphasis on social justice is a central theme in Stalin’s proposed modifications. The aim is to create a scheme that does not discriminate based on caste. This approach aligns with broader goals of inclusivity and equity in governmental policies.

Future Implications

The rejection of the PM Vishwakarma Scheme in Tamil Nadu may have wider implications. It marks the ongoing tensions between state and central governments. The situation also reflects differing perspectives on how best to support traditional artisans in a rapidly changing economic landscape.

Questions for UPSC:

1. Critically analyse the implications of the PM Vishwakarma Scheme on traditional artisans in India.
2. Explain the significance of social justice in government schemes for artisans. Provide suitable examples.
3. What are the potential economic impacts of rejecting central government schemes at the state level?
4. Comment on the role of caste in the implementation of welfare schemes in India. How does it affect social equity?

Answer Hints:

1. Critically analyse the implications of the PM Vishwakarma Scheme on traditional artisans in India.

1. The scheme aims to empower traditional artisans through recognition and financial support.
2. It provides skill upgrading and training, which can enhance competitiveness in the market.
3. Financial assistance, including toolkit incentives and credit support, can help artisans modernize their trades.
4. However, the scheme’s implementation challenges may hinder its effectiveness in reaching all intended beneficiaries.
5. Political opposition and state-level modifications may alter the original objectives of the scheme.

2. Explain the significance of social justice in government schemes for artisans. Provide suitable examples.

1. Social justice ensures equitable access to resources and opportunities for all artisans, irrespective of caste.
2. It promotes inclusivity, allowing a broader range of artisans to benefit from government initiatives.
3. Examples include the removal of family trade requirements in the PM Vishwakarma Scheme, allowing more applicants.
4. Social justice encourages a sense of dignity and recognition among marginalized groups in traditional trades.
5. It aligns government policies with the principles of equity and fairness, crucial for societal harmony.

3. What are the potential economic impacts of rejecting central government schemes at the state level?

1. Rejecting schemes may limit financial support and resources for local artisans, affecting their livelihoods.
2. It can create a rift between state and central governments, impacting cooperative economic development.
3. Potential loss of competitive edge for artisans who could benefit from modern tools and training.
4. Economic disparities may widen if alternative state-level schemes are not effectively implemented.
5. Long-term rejection could discourage future central initiatives aimed at supporting local economies.

4. Comment on the role of caste in the implementation of welfare schemes in India. How does it affect social equity?

1. Caste often influences access to welfare schemes, with marginalized groups facing systemic barriers.
2. Policies that discriminate based on caste can perpetuate inequalities and hinder social mobility.
3. Efforts to address caste biases, such as in the PM Vishwakarma Scheme, aim to promote social equity.
4. Examples of caste-based discrimination can be seen in traditional artisan communities, affecting their recognition and support.
5. Addressing caste in welfare schemes is essential for achieving true inclusivity and fairness in society.