Current Affairs

General Studies Prelims

General Studies (Mains)

Trump’s Opposition to the CHIPS and Science Act

Trump’s Opposition to the CHIPS and Science Act

In early March 2025, former President Donald Trump publicly condemned the CHIPS and Science Act during a joint address to Congress. He urged lawmakers to abolish the law, labelling it misuse of government funds. The CHIPS Act was enacted in August 2022 to stimulate semiconductor manufacturing in the United States. Trump’s remarks came shortly after Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company announced a substantial investment in the US. This situation marks the ongoing debate around semiconductor production and its implications for the US economy.

About Semiconductors

Semiconductors, also known as microchips, are essential components in modern technology. Made primarily from silicon, they contain billions of transistors. These transistors function as switches to process data, enabling various applications in electronics. Semiconductors are integral to everyday items such as smartphones, household appliances, and advanced military systems. Their significance in global trade and technological advancement cannot be overstated.

Overview of the CHIPS Act

The CHIPS and Science Act aims to rejuvenate US semiconductor manufacturing. In the early 1990s, the US produced approximately 40% of the world’s semiconductors. By 2022, this figure had plummeted to about 12%. The Act allocates $53 billion in federal incentives for semiconductor production and research. This funding includes $39 billion for building new manufacturing facilities. Companies can also benefit from a 25% tax credit under this law.

Trump’s Criticism of the CHIPS Act

Trump has consistently opposed the CHIPS Act, regarding it as a waste of taxpayer money. He argues that tariffs could achieve similar outcomes without the need for substantial government spending. Some Republican leaders share his concerns, particularly regarding the Act’s social provisions, which they believe could be repealed. Trump’s comments raised alarms among officials who worry about potential disruptions to funding agreements established during the Biden administration.

Impact on the Semiconductor Industry

The semiconductor industry is crucial for the US economy. It drives innovation and job creation. Trump’s opposition to the CHIPS Act could jeopardise investments from companies like Micron and TSMC. These firms are poised to create thousands of jobs and boost local economies. Critics argue that dismantling the Act could hinder the US’s ability to compete globally in semiconductor manufacturing.

Future of Semiconductor Manufacturing in the US

The future of semiconductor manufacturing in the United States is uncertain. The CHIPS Act represents investment in the industry. However, ongoing political opposition may affect its implementation. The US must navigate these challenges to reclaim its position in the global semiconductor market.

Questions for UPSC:

  1. Discuss the implications of the semiconductor industry on global trade.
  2. Critically examine the role of government incentives in promoting domestic manufacturing.
  3. What are the potential economic impacts of a decline in semiconductor production in the US? Explain.
  4. What strategies can nations adopt to strengthen their semiconductor supply chains? Discuss with suitable examples.

Answer Hints:

1. Discuss the implications of the semiconductor industry on global trade.
  1. Semiconductors are foundational to modern electronics, influencing trade in various sectors.
  2. Global supply chains rely heavily on semiconductor availability, affecting production timelines and costs.
  3. Countries with advanced semiconductor capabilities, like Taiwan and South Korea, hold trade advantages.
  4. Disruptions in semiconductor supply can lead to economic instability and increased prices worldwide.
  5. The semiconductor industry drives technological innovation, shaping competitive dynamics in global markets.
2. Critically examine the role of government incentives in promoting domestic manufacturing.
  1. Government incentives can lower production costs and attract investment in domestic manufacturing sectors.
  2. Subsidies and tax credits can stimulate research and development, encouraging innovation in technology.
  3. Incentives can help revitalize industries that have been offshored, creating jobs and economic growth.
  4. Critics argue that such incentives may lead to misallocation of resources and dependency on government support.
  5. Successful examples include the CHIPS Act, which aims to restore US semiconductor manufacturing competitiveness.
3. What are the potential economic impacts of a decline in semiconductor production in the US? Explain.
  1. A decline in semiconductor production can lead to job losses in manufacturing and related sectors.
  2. It can increase reliance on foreign imports, making the economy vulnerable to global supply chain disruptions.
  3. Reduced domestic production may hinder technological innovation and competitiveness in high-tech industries.
  4. Economic growth could stagnate as industries dependent on advanced chips face shortages and increased costs.
  5. Long-term impacts include loss of leadership in technology and diminished global economic influence.
4. What strategies can nations adopt to strengthen their semiconductor supply chains? Discuss with suitable examples.
  1. Diversifying supply sources can mitigate risks associated with geopolitical tensions and natural disasters.
  2. Investing in domestic manufacturing capabilities, as seen with the US CHIPS Act, encourages local production.
  3. Forming international partnerships and alliances can enhance resource sharing and collaborative innovation.
  4. Implementing trade policies that protect and promote local industries can strengthen supply chain resilience.
  5. Countries like Japan and South Korea have invested heavily in R&D to maintain leadership in semiconductor technology.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archives