The United Nations (UN) marks its 80th anniversary amid deep global changes. Established after World War II to prevent conflict and promote peace, it now faces a multipolar world with complex challenges. Its role in peacekeeping, humanitarian aid, and norm-setting remains vital but contested. Calls for reform, especially of the Security Council, have intensified to reflect new global realities.
Origins and Evolution of the United Nations
The UN was founded in 1945 to prevent war and uphold international law. It replaced the failed League of Nations. Initially shaped by the Cold War rivalry, it later adapted to post-Cold War cooperation. The UN has had mixed success; it faltered in Rwanda and Srebrenica but succeeded in East Timor and Namibia. Its agencies provide crucial humanitarian aid worldwide.
Changing Global Landscape and Multipolarity
The post-war bipolar world has shifted to a fragmented multipolar order. New powers like India, Brazil, and South Africa have emerged. Old alliances have weakened. Global challenges such as climate change and cyber threats transcend borders. This complexity demands that the UN adapt to remain relevant and effective.
Security Council Reform and Representation
The UN Security Council (UNSC) still reflects 1945 power structures. Its five permanent members wield veto power, limiting decision-making. Rising nations seek permanent seats to enhance legitimacy. India’s bid is notable given its population, democracy, peacekeeping contributions, and economic growth. Reform is essential for efficacy and fairness.
UN’s Role in Humanitarian Aid and Norm Setting
UN agencies like UNHCR, WFP, and UNICEF deliver aid in crises. Peacekeepers maintain fragile stability despite resource constraints. The UN shapes global norms on human rights, gender equality, and sustainable development. The 2015 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) set an ambitious global agenda beyond national borders.
Challenges of Political Will and Funding
The UN’s effectiveness depends on member-states’ support. Powerful nations sometimes block action using vetoes or withhold funding. Budget shortfalls force programme cuts and staff reductions. Political disagreements and nationalism undermine multilateral cooperation, weakening the UN’s capacity to respond to crises.
India’s Strategic Autonomy and Global Governance
India pursues strategic autonomy, avoiding alignment with major power blocs. It seeks a global order that respects sovereignty and includes diverse voices. India advocates principled, inclusive reform of the UN system. Its vision emphasises dignity, cooperation, and equitable representation rather than dominance.
Future Directions – Agility, Voice, and Commitment
The UN must become more agile by streamlining decisions and using digital tools. It needs to reclaim its moral authority to uphold universal values amid disinformation. Member-states must renew political and financial commitments. Only with collective will can the UN meet the demands of an interconnected and volatile world.
Questions for UPSC:
- Critically discuss the need for reform in the United Nations Security Council in the context of the evolving global power structure.
- Examine the role of multilateral institutions like the United Nations in addressing transnational challenges such as climate change and cyber security.
- Discuss in the light of India’s foreign policy how strategic autonomy influences its approach to global governance and multilateralism.
- Analyse the impact of nationalism on international cooperation and multilateralism, with examples from recent global events.
Answer Hints:
1. Critically discuss the need for reform in the United Nations Security Council in the context of the evolving global power structure.
- The UNSC’s permanent membership reflects 1945 power dynamics, ignoring current multipolar realities.
- Rising powers like India, Germany, Japan, Brazil, and South Africa seek permanent seats for equitable representation.
- Veto power of the P5 often blocks decisive action, undermining legitimacy and effectiveness.
- Exclusion of key stakeholders weakens UNSC’s ability to address contemporary global crises.
- Reform is essential for enhancing UNSC’s legitimacy, inclusiveness, and operational efficacy.
- Failure to reform risks the UN becoming irrelevant in a fragmented, multipolar world order.
2. Examine the role of multilateral institutions like the United Nations in addressing transnational challenges such as climate change and cyber security.
- UN provides a global platform for negotiation, consensus-building, and norm-setting on transnational issues.
- Agencies and frameworks like the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) promote coordinated climate action.
- Multilateralism enables pooling of resources, expertise, and political will beyond national borders.
- Challenges like cyber warfare transcend sovereignty, requiring cooperative global governance mechanisms.
- UN’s moral authority helps uphold universal values and mobilize collective responses amid disinformation.
- However, effectiveness is limited by political will, funding constraints, and veto powers of powerful states.
3. Discuss in the light of India’s foreign policy how strategic autonomy influences its approach to global governance and multilateralism.
- India emphasizes sovereignty and non-alignment, avoiding entanglement in power bloc rivalries.
- Strategic autonomy allows India to protect regional interests while engaging flexibly with multiple powers.
- India advocates for inclusive, representative, and principled reform of global institutions like the UN.
- It seeks a global order respecting dignity, cooperation, and equitable voice rather than dominance.
- India’s role as a major democracy, peacekeeping contributor, and economic power underpins its multilateral engagement.
- This approach balances national interests with global responsibilities in a multipolar world.
4. Analyse the impact of nationalism on international cooperation and multilateralism, with examples from recent global events.
- Rising nationalism encourages suspicion and rejection of multilateralism as threats to sovereignty.
- Nationalist policies have led to withdrawal from or weakening of global agreements (e.g., US exit from Paris Agreement under Trump).
- Nationalism can undermine collective action on issues like climate change, migration, and pandemics.
- It often fuels protectionism, trade wars, and diplomatic tensions, fracturing traditional alliances.
- Conversely, nationalism can motivate liberation and self-determination movements, showing dual effects.
- Current global crises show the need to balance national interests with cooperative multilateral solutions.
