On 14 July 2026 the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation released India’s first trial Index of Services Production for April 2026. The monthly series uses 2024–25 as the base year and covers 19 formal services sub-sectors, representing about 60% of the formal services economy.
What the Index is
The Index of Services Production (ISP) is a monthly output indicator for the formal services sector. It complements the Index of Industrial Production by measuring short-term real-volume changes in services output and informing monthly economic monitoring.
Why it matters
- High-frequency monitoring — Provides monthly signals on demand, output and activity in services where quarterly GDP release is too slow for short-term policy action.
- Policy calibration — Assists the Reserve Bank of India and fiscal authorities to detect turning points and design timely monetary, liquidity and sector-specific measures.
- Sector diagnosis — Enables identification of sub-sectoral shocks (transport, retail, hospitality) for targeted interventions and employment policy.
- Statistical completeness — Moves output measurement from value-only turnover to deflated real-volume estimates for better alignment with GDP accounting.
Core features and coverage
- Scope — Trial ISP covers 19 formal services sub-sectors; accounts for ~60% of the formal services economy.
- Base year — 2024–25.
- Release schedule — Monthly sub-sectoral indices will be released on the 29th of every month.
- Governance — MoSPI is the nodal ministry. The Technical Advisory Committee on ISP (TAC-ISP) was constituted in May 2025; its report was published on 7 July 2026.
Sectoral weights (selected)
| Sub-sector | Weight (%) |
| Wholesale and retail trade | 23.0 |
| Information and banking-related services | 22.5 |
| Administrative and support services | 15.0 |
| Banking | 11.0 |
| Road transport | 7.68 |
| Accommodation and food services | 4.27 |
| Telecommunication | 3.24 |
Methodology and data sources
- Primary pipelines
- GST database — Aggregated SAC-level turnover from GSTR-1 for trade, accommodation, IT, real estate and similar activities.
- Administrative records — Quantity and operational metrics from Ministry of Civil Aviation, Railways, RBI, insurance and telecom regulators for transport and financial services.
- Surveys — The Annual Survey of Incorporated Services Sector Enterprises (ASISSE) will provide additional coverage (phased inclusion beginning 2026–27).
- Realisation of real output — Nominal turnover is deflated using sector-appropriate price indices (WPI for wholesale trade; CPI variants for other services) to derive real-volume movements.
- Output vs GVA — ISP measures output volume and is not a direct substitute for Gross Value Added used in quarterly GDP, though it informs GDP analysis.
April 2026 trial results (key points)
- 14 of 19 sub-sectors recorded double-digit year-on-year growth versus April 2025.
- Top growth: accommodation and food services +37.2%; retail trade +30.8%; administrative and support services +28.7%; real estate +27.7%.
- Contractions: air transport −13.9%; railway transport −0.4%.
- Trial series published on MoSPI portals for public scrutiny and methodological assessment.
Limitations and technical challenges
- Formal-sector bias — GST and administrative records exclude informal and unregistered service providers; large segments (small traders, unincorporated personal services) are missing.
- Non-market exclusion — Public administration, defence, many health and education services provided by governments are not covered in the trial index.
- Deflation issues — Price deflators for services are less granular and timelier than goods indices; mismatch between turnover composition and available CPI/WPI series can distort real estimates.
- Series stability — Short history and methodological changes can produce volatility; benchmarking and back-casting will be required before producing an overall Services Production Index.
- State-level gaps — Many administrative sources are central; state-level activity measurement and validation remain weak.
Institutional and implementation considerations
- Inter-agency data sharing — Sustained ISP compilation requires formalised protocols between MoSPI, Ministry of Finance (GSTN), Civil Aviation, Railways, RBI and sectoral regulators.
- Privacy and confidentiality — Aggregation, anonymisation and secure transfer mechanisms are necessary to access administrative datasets without breaching business confidentiality.
- Capacity and IT systems — MoSPI and partner agencies will need data-processing capacity, automated pipelines and documentation to maintain monthly releases.
- Legal and institutional backing — Statutory backing or inter-ministerial agreements can reduce delays in data flows and improve compliance.
Policy utility and implications
- Monetary policy — Monthly ISP series gives RBI higher-frequency information on activity and inflation-adjusted demand in services.
- Fiscal policy — Central and state governments can use sub-sectoral signals to design targeted stimulus or regulatory relief for distressed services.
- Labour and employment policy — Sectoral expansions and contractions inform skill development, social protection and job-creation strategies.
- Statistical alignment — Transition from value-based turnover to deflated volume aligns Indian statistics with international guidance on service output measurement (OECD manual principles).
Way forward
- Expand coverage — Phase inclusion of unincorporated services, non-market public services and additional sub-sectors using ASISSE and specialised surveys.
- Improve deflators — Develop service-specific price indices and faster release cycles to reduce measurement lag.
- Strengthen data governance — Create standardised legal and technical frameworks for administrative data sharing and quality assurance.
- Stability testing — Run parallel experiments, seasonal adjustments and benchmarking before releasing a comprehensive Services Production Index.
Model Questions
1. Examine how the Index of Services Production addresses data gaps in India’s economic statistics and assists short-term policy formulation. [GS-III: Economic Development]
The ISP provides a monthly real-volume indicator for formal services, filling the gap left by quarterly GDP and the IIP. It uses GST and administrative data to track 19 sub-sectors, enabling quicker detection of demand shifts and sector-specific stress. Policymakers and the RBI can use ISP signals for timely monetary, liquidity and fiscal actions. Limitations include exclusion of informal services and deflator quality, which affect comprehensiveness.
2. Critically analyse the methodological and coverage challenges in compiling a comprehensive services index for India. [GS-III: Economic Development]
Key challenges are formal-sector bias from GST and administrative sources, exclusion of non-market public services, and weak price deflators for many services. Seasonal adjustment, series stability, state-level coverage and linking output to GVA present technical hurdles. Addressing these requires ASISSE expansion, new service CPI series, improved administrative data flows and careful benchmarking before producing an overall composite index.
3. Discuss the institutional mechanisms and inter-departmental coordination required to operationalise and expand indices like the ISP. [GS-II: Governance]
Operationalising ISP needs formal data-sharing protocols between MoSPI, Ministry of Finance (GSTN), Railways, Civil Aviation, RBI and regulators. TAC-ISP provides technical guidance, but legal agreements, anonymisation standards and secure pipelines are essential. Capacity building, IT integration, periodic joint reviews and linking ASISSE outputs will sustain monthly releases. State agencies must be integrated to improve regional coverage and quality control.
4. Evaluate the advantages of moving from value-based nominal turnover indicators to deflated real-volume measures for the services sector. [GS-III: Economic Development]
Deflated real-volume measures remove price effects and reveal true output changes, improving accuracy in growth measurement and GDP decomposition. They prevent inflation-driven misinterpretation of activity, aid business-cycle analysis and allow better-targeted policy. Challenges include constructing timely service-specific price indices and aligning turnover composition with deflators. Reliable deflators and administrative data are prerequisites for valid volume estimates.
Last Modified: July 15, 2026