Daily Activities

UPSC Prelims Current Affairs

UPSC Mains Current Affairs

Current Affairs

Sharavathi Sanctuary Project Faces Karnataka HC Stay

Sharavathi Sanctuary Project Faces Karnataka HC Stay

The Karnataka High Court has directed the state government to halt all ground-level steps inside the Sharavathi Valley Lion-Tailed Macaque Sanctuary and its Eco-Sensitive Zone. The interim order came during hearing of a public interest litigation challenging approval for the 2,000 MW Sharavathi Pumped Storage Project and the proposed Kalkatte Bridge. The case has raised concerns over wildlife protection, forest diversion and the impact on the Western Ghats ecosystem.

Interim Order by High Court

The division bench ordered that no activities should be carried out within the sanctuary or its eco-sensitive zone until further hearing. The court noted that the matter involves serious environmental concerns. The next hearing has been fixed for June 10.

Challenge to Wildlife Board Approval

The petition questioned the Karnataka State Wildlife Board’s decision of January 28, 2025, which approved the project in principle. The petitioners argued that the decision violates Section 29 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. They sought quashing of the approval and the related recommendation made by the Standing Committee of the National Board for Wildlife.

Environmental and Legal Concerns

The petitioners contended that the project would damage the fragile biodiversity of the Western Ghats. They said it could affect flora, fauna and rare endangered species in the sanctuary. They also argued that any activity contrary to the statutory embargo under Section 29 is prohibited in a sanctuary.

Positions Before the Court

The Union government conveyed serious concerns and said no statutory approval had been granted so far. The state argued that the matter was still under consideration before the National Board for Wildlife and that the petition was premature. Karnataka Power Corporation Limited said non-forest activities would not face impediments. The court, however, maintained its interim restraint on all on-ground work.

Last Modified: April 28, 2026

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archives